DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25-01522615·orange·Civil·Contract
Hearing about 2 months agoGRANTED

National Funding, Inc. vs. Klette Electric PLLC

Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel of Record x 2

Hearing date
Jul 14, 2026
Department
C25
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffNational Funding, Inc.
DefendantKlette Electric PLLC
DefendantMary Klette

Attorneys

Thomas D. Sandsfor Defendant

Ruling

dismiss an action if an unrepresented corporation does not obtain counsel within reasonable time.”].) The order relieving Bryan Theis/Theis Law Group, PC as counsel of record for Defendant/Cross-Complainant Magic Brush Car Wash, LP is effective upon counsel filing proofs of service of a copy of the signed order, on the client and on all parties that have appeared in the case. (California Rules of Court, rule 3.1362(e).) Moving Counsel to give notice.

105 National Funding, Inc. vs. Klette Electric PLLC

25-01522615 Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel of Record x 2 Thomas D. Sands (“Moving Attorney”) moves to be relieved as counsel of record for defendants Klette Electric PLLC and Mary Klette. The motions are unopposed and Moving Attorney has stated a basis for permissive withdrawal under the Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 1.16. All other requirements of the applicable California Rules of Court are satisfied. Accordingly, the motions are GRANTED. The orders relieving counsel will be effective upon counsel filing proof of service of a copy of the signed order on the clients and on all parties that have appeared in the case. (California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1362(e).) Moving Attorney to give notice.

106 Creditors Adjustment Bureau, Inc., vs. L S R Builders, Inc.

25-01513310 Motion to Set Aside/Vacate Default and Judgment Defendant L S R BUILDERS, INC. (“Defendant” or “LSR”) moves this Court for an order setting aside and vacating the Default entered against Defendant and the Default Judgment entered on March 16, 2026.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share