DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD24675972·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing 9 months agoDENIED without prejudice.

DELAWARE LAKEWOOD APARTMENTS, LLC VS. ALEXANDRIA RUSSELL ET AL

Motion For Entry Of Judgment Pursuant To Stipulation

Hearing date
Dec 3, 2025
Department
501
Judge
Prevailing
Opposing Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffDELAWARE LAKEWOOD APARTMENTS, LLC
DefendantALEXANDRIA RUSSELL

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD24675972 - December 3, 2025 Hearing date: December 3, 2025 Case number: CUD24675972 Case title: DELAWARE LAKEWOOD APARTMENTS, LLC VS. ALEXANDRIA RUSSELL ET AL Case Number: | | CUD24675972 | Case Title: | | DELAWARE LAKEWOOD APARTMENTS, LLC VS. ALEXANDRIA RUSSELL ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-12-03 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Motion For Entry Of Judgment Pursuant To Stipulation | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for December 3, 2025. Line 8.

PLAINTIFF DELAWARE LAKEWOOD APARTMENTS, LLC Motion For Entry Of Judgment Pursuant To Stipulation; is DENIED without prejudice. No competent evidence provided that defendant is in possession of the premises. =(501/AAT)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share