Clay Montgomery v. Caitlin Montgomery
Review of custody and visitation
Motion type
Causes of action
Parties
Ruling
1 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 4
5) 6 CLAY MONTGOMERY,) Case Number: FDI-24-799969) 7 Petitioner) Hearing Date: August 27, 2026) 8 VS.) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM) 9 CAITLIN MONTGOMERY,) Department: 404) 10 Respondent) Presiding: AI MORI) 11) 12 - REVIEW OF CUSTODY AND VISITATION 13 TENTATIVE RULING 14 The parties are ordered to appear in person or via Zoom video at 11am on 8/27/2026 in 15 Department 404. If a party chooses to appear by Zoom, that party must abide by the Notice and 16 Instructions for Remote Appearance in San Francisco Family Court set forth above. 17 The parties shall be prepared to provide the Court with any updates regarding any Child 18 Protective Services investigation and any other custody and parenting time matters. 19
23
27
29
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”