DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
FDI-24-799969·sf·FamilyLaw·Child Support / Custody Review
Hearing about 1 month agoParties ordered to appear.

Clay Montgomery v. Caitlin Montgomery

Child Support and Custody Review

Hearing date
Jul 16, 2026
Department
404
Judge
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Causes of action

Parties

PetitionerClay Montgomery
RespondentCaitlin Montgomery

Ruling

1 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 4

5) 6 CLAY MONTGOMERY,) Case Number: FDI-24-799969) 7 Petitioner) Hearing Date: July 16, 2026) 8 VS.) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM) 9 CAITLIN MONTGOMERY,) Department: 404) 10 Respondent) Presiding: AI MORI) 11) 12 CHILD SUPPORT ISSUE(S); REVIEW OF CUSTODY AND VISITATION 13 TENTATIVE RULING 14 The parties are ordered to appear in-person or by Zoom at 11AM. If a party chooses to appear 15 by Zoom, that party must abide by the Notice and Instructions for Remote Appearance in San 16 Francisco Family Court set forth above. 17

21

25

29

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share