DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC25623811·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing 8 months agoCONTINUED

JULIANA HILL VS. 735 TAYLOR I1, A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ET AL

Motion And Notice Of Hearing To Set Aside Order Granting Defendants Motion To Strike

Hearing date
Dec 30, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jan 27, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffJULIANA HILL
Defendant735 TAYLOR I1, A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for Dec. 30, 2025. Line 4. PLAINTIFF JULIANA HILL Motion And Notice Of Hearing To Set Aside Order Granting Defendants Motion To Strike is continued to January 27, 2026 at 9:30 a.m., for the opposing party to comply with LRSF 2.7B and provide courtesy copies of the opposition papers no later than January 13, 2026 with a cover letter reflecting the new hearing date. (Moving papers received.) =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share