DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
23CV427373·santaclara·Civil·Injunction
Hearing todayOFF CALENDAR

Sikh Gurdwara- San Jose (California) vs Surinder Sangha

Motion for Summary Judgment/Adjudication

Hearing date
Aug 27, 2026
Department
1
Prevailing
N/A
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Summary Adjudication rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffSikh Gurdwara- San Jose (California)
DefendantSurinder Sangha

Ruling

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 1 Honorable Eunice Lee, Presiding TBD, Courtroom Clerk 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113

DATE: August 27, 2026 TIME: 9:00 A.M. and 9:01 A.M. To contest the ruling, call the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. Make sure to also let the other side know before 4:00 P.M. that you plan to contest the ruling, in accordance with California Rule of Court, Rule 3.1308(a)(1) and Local Rule 8D.

**Please specify the issue to be contested when calling the Court and counsel**

LAW AND MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS 9:00 A.M. LINE 1 17CV315304 Capital One Bank Motion to Set Aside Default Judgment (USA), N.A. vs Scroll down to Line 1 for Tentative Ruling. Juan Campos

LINE 2 23CV427373 Sikh Gurdwara- Motion for Summary Judgment/Adjudication San Jose OFF CALENDAR. On January 8, 2026, Defendant Surinder Sangha filed (California) vs this motion for summary adjudication. On February 13, 2026, the Surinder Sangha Honorable Jose Franco issued an Order granting a permanent injunction against Defendant Sangha after the matter proceeded to trial. Thus, this motion is rendered MOOT. LINE 3 24CV454891 Janae Scales et al Motion for Summary Judgment/Adjudication vs Ford Motor Scroll down to Line 3 for Tentative Ruling. Company et al LINE 4 25CV456790 William Motion for Terminating Sanctions Backstrand et al vs Scroll down to Line 4 for Tentative Ruling. Vincent Braga et al

LINE 5 25CV462475 Monica Ramos et Motion for Leave to File al vs Angela Scroll down to Line 5 for Tentative Ruling. Pollard, MD et al LINES 25CV477274 Yevgeniy Tilman et Motion to Strike (Line # 6); Motion to Strike (Line # 7); 6-8 al vs Ruby Dobry Lines # 7-8 OFF CALENDAR. On April 20, 2026, Plaintiffs filed a First et al Amended Complaint rendering the Defendants’ anti-SLAPP special motion to strike filed on January 21, 2026 (Line # 6) and Motion to Strike filed on December 12, 2025 (Line # 7) as MOOT.

Motion for Protective Order (Line # 8) Scroll down to Line #8 for Tentative Ruling.

- oo0oo –

2

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share