DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
1377830·santabarbara·Civil·Conservatorship - Person and Estate
Hearing 16 days agoConservatorship to continue

Conservatorship of Kayla L Hildenbrand

Review Investigator's Report

Hearing date
Aug 11, 2026
Department
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Aug 10, 2027
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Ruling

The court investigator's report has been received and recommends that the conservatorship continue. No appearance is required. The next review hearing will be held on August 10, 2027. The court will give notice. Tentative Ruling: Conservatorship of Kayla L Hildenbrand Tentative Ruling: Conservatorship of Kayla L Hildenbrand Case Number 1377830 Case Type Conservatorship - Person and Estate Hearing Date / Time Tue, 08/11/2026 - 09:00 Nature of Proceedings Review Investigator's Report Tentative Ruling Probate Notes: The court investigator's report has been received and recommends that the conservatorship continue.

No appearance is required. The next review hearing will be held on August 10, 2027. The Court will send notice to all parties. Tentative Ruling: Absolute Resolutions Investments, LLC vs Vicente Tejada Tentative Ruling: Absolute Resolutions Investments, LLC vs Vicente Tejada Case Number 20CV01237 Case Type Unlimited Other Collections (09) Hearing Date / Time Tue, 08/25/2026 - 08:30 Nature of Proceedings Motion for Entry of Judgment Tentative Ruling /media/2183 Tentative Ruling: Matter of Opie James Lopez Tentative Ruling: Matter of Opie James Lopez Case Number 21PR00410 Case Type Minor/Disabled Person's Compromise Hearing Date / Time Tue, 09/01/2026 - 09:00 Nature of Proceedings Review of Acknowledgement & Receipt Tentative Ruling

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share