Review Investigator's Report
Case Type Conservatorship Hearing Date / Time Tue, 08/11/2026 - 09:00 Nature of Proceedings Court Investigator's Biennial Review Tentative Ruling Probate Notes: The court investigator's report has been received and recommends that the conservatorship continue. No appearance is required. The next review hearing will be held on August 8, 2028. The Court will send notice to all parties.
Tentative Ruling: Red Target LLC vs Dock A Wickham et al Tentative Ruling: Red Target LLC vs Dock A Wickham et al Case Number 23CV01736 Case Type Limited Rule 3.740 Collections (09) Hearing Date / Time Tue, 08/04/2026 - 08:30 Nature of Proceedings Motion to Amend Default Judgment Tentative Ruling /media/2174
Tentative Ruling: Laurie Ramirez vs Santa Maria Joint Union High School Tentative Ruling: Laurie Ramirez vs Santa Maria Joint Union High School Case Number 23CV03871 Case Type Unlimited Other Employment (15) Hearing Date / Time Tue, 07/21/2026 - 08:30 Nature of Proceedings Motion for Summary Judgment Tentative Ruling /media/2164
Tentative Ruling: Conservatorship of Kayla L Hildenbrand Tentative Ruling: Conservatorship of Kayla L Hildenbrand Case Number 1377830 Case Type Conservatorship - Person and Estate
Hearing Date / Time Tue, 08/11/2026 - 09:00 Nature of Proceedings Review Investigator's Report Tentative Ruling Probate Notes: The court investigator's report has been received and recommends that the conservatorship continue. No appearance is required. The next review hearing will be held on August 10, 2027. The Court will send notice to all parties.
Tentative Ruling: Conservatorship of Liliana Gonzalez Tentative Ruling: Conservatorship of Liliana Gonzalez Case Number 24PR00504 Case Type Conservatorship Hearing Date / Time Tue, 07/14/2026 - 09:00 Nature of Proceedings Review: First Accounting and Report if Conservator Tentative Ruling Probate Notes: Appearances required.
After review of the Supplement filed on June 22, 2026, the following is noted for the Court: Discrepancy no. 1 - Many entries in Schedule C fail to list both payee AND purpose, and the purposes that are listed are not descriptive enough to give the Court information necessary to determine the reasonableness and necessity of the disbursements. Please submit supplement explaining the following purposes: All "Hum Comphen" and "Humana" disbursements.
Resolution of Disc. no. 1 after review of Supplement: It is recommended the court find the discrepancy resolved, but issue warning that future unexplained disbursements will be found to be unnecessary, and charged against the conservator as a surcharge.
Discrepancy no. 2 - Several unusual expenditures were not explained. A supplement to the petition must be filed explaining the following unusual expenditures, including the nature and purpose of the expenditure in sufficient detail to allow the court to analyze the necessity of the expenditure (Prob. Code, Sec. 1064(a)(2)): DATE | PAYEE | AMOUNT PAID | Multiple dates | Ross, Marshalls, Amazon, JC Penny |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”