DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26STLC02191·la·Civil·Landlord-Tenant / Contract
Hearing todayDENIED

Cosey v. 1618 83rd LLC

Special Motion to Strike Portions of Plaintiff's Complaint

Hearing date
Aug 26, 2026
Department
25
Prevailing
Opposing Party

Motion type

Browse all Anti-SLAPP Motion rulings statewide →

Causes of action

Parties

PlaintiffCandace T. Cosey
Defendant1618 83rd LLC

Ruling

Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Western's motion for attorney fees and costs in the amount of $3,312.13. Western is to give notice.

26, 2026 JUDGE /DEPT: Eisenman/25 CASE NAME: Cosey v. 1618 83rd LLC COMP. FILED: 04-01-26 CASE NUMBER: 26STLC02191 NOTICE: OK PROCEEDINGS: SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT MOVING PARTY: Defendant 1618 83rd LLC RESP. PARTY: Plaintiff Candace T. Cosey SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE (Code Civ. Proc., Sec. 425.16) TENTATIVE RULING: The Court DENIES 1618 83rd LLC's special motion to strike. Cosey is to give notice. SERVICE: [X] Proof of Service Timely Filed (CRC, rule 3.1300) OK [X] Correct Address (CCP Sec.Sec. 1013, 1013a) OK [X] 16/21 Court Days Lapsed (CCP Sec.Sec. 12c, 1005(b)) OK OPPOSITION: Filed on August 14, 2026 [X] Late [] None REPLY: Filed on August 18, 2026 [] Late [] None ANALYSIS: Candace T.

Cosey sued 1618 83rd LLC for breach of contract, fraud, unjust enrichment, breach of implied warranty of habitability, retaliation, breach of covenant of quiet enjoyment, and constructive eviction. 1618 answered, and then filed this special motion to strike pursuant to the anti-SLAPP statute, Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16. Motions to strike in limited jurisdiction courts may only challenge pleadings "on the ground that the damages or relief sought are not supported by the allegations of the complaint." (Code Civ.

Proc. Sec. 92, subd. (d).) Anti-SLAPP motions to strike are

precluded in limited jurisdiction cases. (1550 Laurel Owner's Association, Inc. v. Appellate Division of Superior Court of Los Angeles County (2018) 28 Cal.App.5th 1146, 1158.) Accordingly, the Court DENIES 1618's special motion to strike. Cosey is to give notice. | Home -->)" -->

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share