DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC25625334·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing 7 months agoDENIED in part and MOOT in part

PICHINO CASEY ET AL VS. SIC-MCM 825 POST STREET, LP ET AL

MOTION TO STRIKE Amended COMPLAINT

Hearing date
Jan 16, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Strike rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffPICHINO CASEY
DefendantSIC-MCM 825 POST STREET, LP
DefendantGREENTREE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT INC.

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC25625334 - January 16, 2026 Hearing date: January 16, 2026 Case number: CGC25625334 Case title: PICHINO CASEY ET AL VS. SIC-MCM 825 POST STREET, LP ET AL Case Number: | | CGC25625334 | Case Title: | | PICHINO CASEY ET AL VS. SIC-MCM 825 POST STREET, LP ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-01-16 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION TO STRIKE Amended COMPLAINT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for January 16, 2026. Line 4.2.

DEFENDANT SIC-MCM 825 POST STREET, LP, GREENTREE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT INC. MOTION TO STRIKE Amended COMPLAINT is DENIED in part and MOOT in part.

Motion is denied as to the request for punitive damages. Complaint sufficiently states facts to support conscious disregard for tenant's rights. Motion is otherwise moot/denied. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share