KITA VS SCHWARTZ
MOTION TO AMEND JUDGMENT BY JEFFERSON KITA
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
the agreement by failing to make all required payments on her account; and (4) that breach resulted in damages in the amount of $28,080.61. Plaintiff is accordingly entitled to judgment as a matter of law. (Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001) 25 Cal.4th 826, 843.)
All future hearing dates are VACATED.
5. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME MOTION TO AMEND JUDGMENT BY CVPS2509126 KITA VS SCHWARTZ JEFFERSON KITA Tentative Ruling: No tentative ruling. The motion does not comply with Local Rule 3316C. Parties wishing to argue the motion are ordered to appear. Appearance may be telephonic.
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”