DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
30-2026-01587961·orange·Civil·Unlawful Detainer
Hearing todayOVERRULED

922 S. Park Circle, LLC vs. Velazquez

Demurrer

Hearing date
Aug 26, 2026
Department
C61
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Demurrer rulings statewide →

Parties

Plaintiff922 S. Park Circle, LLC
DefendantVelazquez

Ruling

Where a party has completely failed to respond timely to requests for admission, section 2033.280 does not require a meet-and-confer before bringing a motion to deem the matters admitted.

Plaintiff’s counsel did not request a continuance before the July 24, 2026 hearing, although such a request could have been electronically filed. No attorney or other representative from the Law Office of Bruce C. Bridgman appeared at the hearing, and no one contacted the Court to request a continuance based on an emergency or other circumstance.

The record also reflects that, on July 15, 2026, the matter was on calendar for a hearing on the Demurrer to the Complaint. Plaintiff’s counsel did not appear at that hearing. The Court sustained the demurrer with leave to amend. Plaintiff’s counsel did not move at that hearing, or thereafter, to take the Motion to Deem Answer Admitted off calendar.

Based on the record before it, the Court finds that Plaintiff has not met its burden under Code of Civil Procedure sections 1008 or 473. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED.

The Court Clerk to provide notice of the Court’s ruling.

4 30-2026-01587961 The Court has read and considered the Defendant’s Demurrer (ROA 11) and 922 S. Park Circle, the Complaint (ROA 2). LLC vs. Velazquez The Court OVERRULES the Demurrer.

The Defendant is ordered to file an Answer within 5 calendar days.

Plaintiff’s counsel is ordered to provide notice of the Court’s ruling.

Date: 08/28/2026 Courtroom Rules and Notices

The Court will continue to upload tentative rulings as they are completed. Please be sure to keep checking until 8:30 AM on the day of your hearing.

Written responses, oppositions, or filings that are filed later than 12:15 PM the day before the hearing on the motion will go on second call by the Court for the Court to have an opportunity to review any lastminute filings. If a party files a written response, opposition, or any filing after 12:15 PM on the day before the hearing, the party must ensure they are available for the Court's afternoon calendar the day of the hearing.

Submitting on tentative rulings: If all counsel/parties intend to submit on the tentative ruling and do not desire oral argument, please advise the Courtroom Clerk or Courtroom Attendant by calling (657) 622-5261 – both counsel need to state they are submitting on the tentative. Please do not call the Department unless all parties submit to the tentative ruling. If all sides submit on the tentative ruling and so advise the Court, the tentative ruling shall become the Court’s final ruling, and the prevailing party shall give notice of the ruling and prepare an order for the Court’s signature if appropriate under Cal. R. Ct. 3.1312.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share