DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
34-2022-00314168-CU-PA-GDS·sacramento·Civil·Personal Injury
Hearing over 2 years agoCONTINUED

Troy Smith vs. Asitosh Kumar

Case Management Conference

Hearing date
Apr 19, 2024
Department
43
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Apr 11, 2025
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffTroy Smith
DefendantAsitosh Kumar
DefendantSulesh Kumar
Cross-ComplainantDevine & Son Trucking Co., Inc

Ruling

34-2022-00314168-CU-PA-GDS: Troy Smith vs. Asitosh Kumar 04/19/2024 Case Management Conference - Case Management Program in Department 43

Tentative Ruling

Notices:

Please note that on or after October 10,2022, cases scheduled for a Case Management Conference (CMC) in Department 31 will be set in Department 43 on Fridays at 8:30 a.m.

Any party who wishes to contest the tentative ruling below must: (1) request a hearing by calling the clerk in Department 43 at (916) 874-7561 no later than 4:00 p.m. on the Court day before the scheduled CMC, and (2) advise opposing counsel of the request. If a hearing is not requested by 4:00 p.m. on the Court day before the scheduled CMC, the tentative ruling will become the final order of the Court.

If a hearing is requested, the Court assumes all parties will appear remotely via Zoom unless the Court orders in-person attendance. The Department 43 Zoom ID is: 160 9096 1628. To appear telephonically via Zoom, call (833) 568-8864 and enter the Department 43 Zoom ID referenced above.

All parties requesting oral argument for Department 43 will be heard at 9:00 a.m. the day of the scheduled hearing.

Court’s Tentative Ruling:

No appearance is required under the following conditions:

On the Court's own motion, the Case Management Conference - Case Management Program scheduled for 04/19/2024 is continued to 04/11/2025 at 8:30 AM in Department 43 at Gordon D. Schaber Superior Court.

New Case Management Statements shall be filed by all parties no later than 15 days prior to the hearing pursuant to Local Rule 2.51.

Cross complaint filed 09/15/2022 by Ashitosh Kumar and Sulesh Kumar:

Cross-Complaint shall name and serve the Roe Cross-Defendants forthwith. Cross-Complaint shall also file all Proofs of Service, showing service of the Cross-Defendants and shall diligently proceed to obtain the responsive pleading, default, or dismissal as to the Cross-complaint. As the case is not presently at-issue, the Case Management Conference is continued.

Cross complaint filed 03/26/2024 by Devine & Son Trucking Co., Inc:

34-2022-00314168-CU-PA-GDS: Troy Smith vs. Asitosh Kumar 04/19/2024 Case Management Conference - Case Management Program in Department 43

The Cross-Complainant is directed to serve the Cross-Defendants with the Cross-Complaint and shall diligently proceed to obtain the responsive pleading, default, or dismissal of Cross- Defendants as to the Cross-Complaint.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share