Renderos VS Clearview AI, Inc.
Motion to Compel Further Discovery Responses
Motion type
Browse all Motion to Compel Further Responses rulings statewide →
Parties
Ruling
RG21096898: Renderos VS Clearview AI, Inc. 08/26/2026 Hearing on Motion to Compel Further Discovery Responses filed by Clearview AI, Inc. (Defendant) CRS# 130322311084 in Department 18
Tentative Ruling - 08/25/2026 Patrick McKinney
The Hearing on Motion to Compel Further Discovery Responses filed by Clearview AI, Inc. (Defendant) CRS# 130322311084 scheduled for 08/26/2026 is continued to 09/16/2026 at 01:30 PM in Department 18 at Rene C. Davidson Courthouse.
The motion is continued to September 16th at 1:30p.m. in Department 18. Defendants omnibus motion remains procedurally improper, as the court has previously indicated. Unless the requests are so interrelated as to make separate motions wholly inefficient, this type omnibus motion is procedurally improper. (See Weil, et al., Cal. Prac. Guide: Civ. Proc. Before Trial (Rutter Group 2026), ¶ 8:1140.1.) Moreover, the parties August 19 Joint Statement failed to meaningfully narrow or clarify the issues remaining in this dispute. The court admonishes the parties to promptly further meet and confer in good faith to address and resolve as many outstanding issues as possible and, by Friday, September 11th, file a further joint statement clearly identifying any remaining issues requiring the courts intervention.
CONTESTING TENTATIVE ORDERS
Notify the Court and all other parties no later than 4:00 pm the day before the scheduled hearing and identify the issues you wish to argue through the following steps.
1. Log into eCourt Public Portal - https://eportal.alameda.courts.ca.gov 2. Case Search 3. Enter the Case Number and select Search 4. Select the Case Name 5. Select the Tentative Rulings Tab 6. Select Click to Contest this Ruling 7. Enter your Name and Reason for Contesting 8. Select Proceed.
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”