Motion to Compel Further Discovery Responses
Browse all Motion to Compel Further Responses rulings statewide →
RG21096898: Renderos VS Clearview AI, Inc. 07/29/2026 Hearing on Motion to Compel Further Discovery Responses filed by Clearview AI, Inc. (Defendant) CRS# 130322311084 in Department 18
Tentative Ruling - 07/27/2026 Patrick McKinney
The Motion to Compel Further Discovery Responses filed by Clearview AI, Inc. on 06/16/2026 is Denied.
The motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
As an initial matter, Defendants motion is procedurally problematic. Defendants motion seeks further responses to Special Interrogatories, Form Interrogatories, Requests for Admission, and Request for Production of Documents as to six (6) different Plaintiffs. Defendants notice of motion makes clear that it is not seeking identical relief from each plaintiff. Thus, Defendants motion is essentially four motions to compel as to six separate plaintiffs. Unless the requests are so interrelated as to make separate motions wholly inefficient, this type omnibus motion is procedurally improper. (See Weil, et al., Cal. Prac. Guide: Civ. Proc. Before Trial (Rutter Group 2026), ¶ 8:1140.1.)
Second, Plaintiffs opposition briefing indicates that supplemental responses were served on July 8, 2026 and that these responses moot much of Defendants motion. Defendant disputes this contention in large part in its reply papers. However, the record at this point is sufficiently muddled that the court is not in a position to issue precise orders.
Given the procedural impropriety of the motion and Plaintiffs recent supplementation of their responses, the court denies this motion without prejudice to Defendant bringing renewed, more precisely targeted motions to address any ongoing deficiencies in Plaintiffs responses and document production. The motion to compel deadline would be pegged to Plaintiffs supplemental responses and/or verifications of same.
CONTESTING TENTATIVE ORDERS
Notify the Court and all other parties no later than 4:00 pm the day before the scheduled hearing and identify the issues you wish to argue through the following steps.
1. Log into eCourt Public Portal - https://eportal.alameda.courts.ca.gov 2. Case Search 3. Enter the Case Number and select Search 4. Select the Case Name 5. Select the Tentative Rulings Tab 6. Select Click to Contest this Ruling 7. Enter your Name and Reason for Contesting RG21096898: Renderos VS Clearview AI, Inc. 07/29/2026 Hearing on Motion to Compel Further Discovery Responses filed by Clearview AI, Inc. (Defendant) CRS# 130322311084 in Department 18 8. Select Proceed.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”