Maudie Pollastrini v. Auberge Resorts, LLC et al
Defendant Auberge Resorts, LLC’s motion to compel arbitration; Defendant’s demurrer to plaintiff’s first amended complaint; Defendant’s motion to stay plaintiff’s first amended complaint
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
Estate of Hassan Ahmed Elgendy 26PR000143
PETITION FOR LETTERS OF ADMINISTRATION AND AUTHORIZATION TO ADMINISTER UNDER THE INDEPENDENT ADMINISTRATION OF ESTATES ACT
TENTATIVE RULING: The Petition is GRANTED. Michael Torr is appointed as probate referee. The matter is set for a Status Hearing Re: Final Distribution on August 25, 2027, at 8:30 a.m. in Dept. B. The Status Hearing may be vacated or continued without appearances needed if, prior thereto, the personal representative files a petition for an order for final distribution or a report of status of administration pursuant to Probate Code section 12200. The clerk is directed to provide notice to the parties.
In The Matter of Fred A. Silva Bypass Trust 26PR000161
PETITION FOR AN ORDER CONFIRMING SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE OR, ALTERNATIVELY, APPOINTING SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE
TENTATIVE RULING: The petition is GRANTED.
CIVIL LAW & MOTION CALENDAR – Hon. Joseph J. Solga, Dept. B (Historic Courthouse) at 8:30 a.m.
Maudie Pollastrini v. Auberge Resorts, LLC et al 24CV001401
[1] DEFENDANT AUBERGE RESORTS, LLC’S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION
TENTATIVE RULING: The motion is CONTINUED to September 9, 2026, at 8:30 a.m. in Dept. B.
Defendant Auberge Resorts LLC ("Auberge") moves, the Court for an Order compelling arbitration of the claims filed by Plaintiff Maudie Pollastrini ("Plaintiff").
[2] DEFENDANT’S DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
TENTATIVE RULING: The motion is CONTINUED to September 9, 2026, at 8:30 a.m. in Dept. B.
Defendant Auberge Resorts LLC ("Auberge") demur, pursuant to California Code of Civil procedure section § 430.10, to Plaintiff Maudie Pollastrini's ("Plaintiff") First Amended Complaint.
[3] DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STAY PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
TENTATIVE RULING: The motion is CONTINUED to September 9, 2026, at 8:30 a.m. in Dept. B.
Defendant Auberge Resorts LLC ("Auberge") moves, for an order staying the case pending resolution of the arbitration in the above-entitled action filed by Plaintiff Maudie Pollastrini ("Plaintiff").
Nai Saechao v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc 26CV001131
[1] DEFENDANT’S DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT
[2] DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF PLAINITFF’S COMPLAINT
TENTATIVE RULING: Both matters are CONTINUED to September 23, 2026 at 8:30 a.m. in Dept. B to allow the moving party to provide a Local Rule compliant notice. The moving party failed to include, in either notices of the demurrer or motion, proper notice of the Court’s tentative ruling system as required by Local Rule 2.9. The moving party is directed to (1) prepare an Amended Notice for both matters, which contains the continued hearing date and notice of the Court’s tentative ruling system as required by Local Rule 2.9, (2) provide timely service of the Amended Notice to all other parties, and (3) file a proof of such service pursuant to Rules of Court, rule 3.1300, subd. (c).
In The Matter of Frances Peralta Carrillo 26CV001431
PETITION FOR CHANGE OF NAME
TENTATIVE RULING: Notice has been properly published and no written objections have been filed. The petition is GRANTED without need for appearance.
Jason Moulton et al v. Bowman Construction and Development, Inc 26CV001527
VERIFIED PETITION FOR RELEASE OF INVALID MECHANICS’ LIEN
TENTATIVE RULING: The matter is CONTINUED to September 24, 2026, at 8:30 a.m. in Dept. B to allow Petitioner to remedy the following items.
Should Petitioner fail to properly cure the below defects, the Court will be forced to deny the Petition without prejudice, as September 24, 2026 is the last court day before the 60th day after the filing of the petition. (See Civ. Code § 8486, subd. (a) [“The court may continue the
7
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”