DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24CV001401·napa·Civil·Contract
Hearing 11 days agoCONTINUED

Maudie Pollatrini v. Auberge Resorts, LLC et al

Motion to Compel Arbitration; Demurrer to First Amended Complaint; Motion to Stay First Amended Complaint

Hearing date
Aug 7, 2026
Department
A
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Aug 25, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffMaudie Pollatrini
DefendantAuberge Resorts, LLC

Ruling

“The prevailing party is entitled to reasonable attorney’s fees.” (Civ. Code, 8488, subd. (c).) To the extent judgment is in favor of Petitioners, the Court finds that the hourly rate charged by counsel, time spent preparing the Application, and court costs, for a total of $4,200 [= $525 / hr x 7 hrs + $525 costs] are reasonable. (See Declaration of Jason Luros, filed 7/6/26, at ¶¶ 9, 11-12.) The Court does not, however, grant estimated future fees. (See Id., ¶ 10.)

**at 9:30 a.m.** Maudie Pollatrini v. Auberge Resorts, LLC et al 24CV001401

[1] DEFENDANT AUBERGE RESORTS, LLC’S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION

[2] DEFENDANT’S DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT and [3] DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STAY PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

TENTATIVE RULING: All three matters are CONTINUED to August 25, 2026 at 8:30 a.m. in Dept. B.

GUARDIANSHIP CALENDAR – Hon. Francisca P. Tisher, Dept. 6 (Criminal Courts Bldg. – 1111 Third St.) at 2:00 p.m.

Jorge Valdez Melgoza v. Maribel Melgoza Reza 26FL000385

[1] PETITION TO ESTABLISH PARENTAL RELATIONSHIP

[2] REQUEST FOR SPECIAL IMMIGRANT JUVENILE FINDINGS

TENTATIVE RULING: Both matters are GRANTED.

Jesus Valdez Melgoza v. Maribel Melgoza Reza 26FL000395

[1] PETITION TO ESTABLISH PARENTAL RELATIONSHIP

[2] REQUEST FOR SPECIAL IMMIGRANT JUVENILE FINDINGS

TENTATIVE RULING: Both matters are GRANTED.

7

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share