DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26CV162809·alameda·Civil·Pro Hac Vice Admission
Hearing todayGRANTED and the hearing is ADVANCED

MENOR, et al. vs CHANEL, INC., et al.

Ex Parte Application to advance the Pro Hac Vice Application of Michael Lisak

Hearing date
Aug 25, 2026
Department
18
Prevailing
Moving Party
Next hearing
Aug 28, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Ex Parte Application rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffMENOR
DefendantCHANEL, INC.
DefendantCVS Pharmacy, Inc.
DefendantLongs Drug Stores California, LLC
DefendantSafeway Inc.
DefendantWalgreen Co.

Ruling

26CV162809: MENOR, et al. vs CHANEL, INC., et al. 08/25/2026 Hearing on Ex Parte Application to advance the Pro Hac Vice Application of Michael Lisak (Reservation No. 882002002619) CRS# A-162809-061 in Department 18

Tentative Ruling - 08/25/2026 Patrick McKinney

Defendant CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Longs Drug Stores California, LLC, Safeway Inc., and Walgreen Co.'s (“Defendants”) Ex Parte Application for an order shortening time to hear their application for order granting pro hac vice admission of Michael Lisak ("Applicant") is GRANTED and the hearing is ADVANCED to Friday, August 28, 2026 at 10:00 a.m.

The Application for Admission does not comply with the requirements of CRC Rule 9.40 in that Mr. Lisak does not state "the title of each court and cause in which the applicant has filed an application to appear as counsel pro hac vice in this state in the preceding two years, the date of each application, and whether or not it was granted." (CRC 9.40(d)(5).) Instead, the Application refers only to when another attorney has been admitted pro hac vice before this court. (Application para. 10.)

Applicant may submit a corrected application before the continued hearing.

The Hearing on Motion to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice filed by LONGS DRUG STORES CALIFORNIA, L.L.C., individually, as alter-ego of, and as successor-in-interest to LONGS DRUG STORES CALIFORNIA, INC. (Defendant) + CRS# 882002002619 scheduled for 09/30/2026 is reset to 08/28/2026 at 10:00 AM in Department 18 at Rene C. Davidson Courthouse.

Defendants' counsel must forthwith serve a copy of this order on all counsel of record and selfrepresented parties. The Court orders counsel to obtain a copy of this order from the eCourt portal.

CONTESTING THE TENTATIVE RULING: If the parties do not contest the tentative ruling, it will be adopted. Any party wishing to contest the tentative ruling must notify the court by email at Dept18@alameda.courts.ca.gov, and notify all opposing counsel or unrepresented parties by 12:00 pm the day of the hearing.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share