DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26CV162809·alameda·Civil·Pro Hac Vice Admission
Hearing in 6 daysGRANTED

MENOR, et al. vs CHANEL, INC., et al.

Ex Parte Application for an order shortening time; Motion to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice

Hearing date
Aug 25, 2026
Department
18
Prevailing
Moving Party
Next hearing
Sep 9, 2027

Motion type

Browse all Ex Parte Application rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$500

Parties

PlaintiffMENOR
DefendantCHANEL, INC.
DefendantWALGREEN CO.
DefendantWALGREEN LABORATORIES, INC.

Attorneys

Kenneth Gorenbergfor Defendant

Ruling

26CV162809: MENOR, et al. vs CHANEL, INC., et al. 08/25/2026 Hearing on Ex Parte Application for an order shortening time on the pro hac vice application for Kenneth Gorenberg CRS# A-162809-053 in Department 18

Tentative Ruling - 08/16/2026 Patrick McKinney

Defendant Walgreen Co.'s Ex Parte Application for an order shortening time to hear their application for order granting pro hac vice admission of Kenneth Gorenberg ("Applicant") is GRANTED. The Application for Admission substantially complies with the requirements of CRC Rule 9.40 and is GRANTED.

The Hearing on Motion to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice filed by WALGREEN CO., individually and as successor-in-interest, parent, alter ego and equitable trustee of WALGREEN LABORATORIES, INC. (Defendant) CRS# 394409095118 scheduled for 10/07/2026 is advanced to this date and heard.

Pursuant to Government Code section 70617(e)(2), on or before the anniversary of the date of this order Pro Hac Vice Applicant Kenneth Gorenberg (representing Walgreen) shall pay a renewal fee of five hundred dollars ($500) for each year that Pro Hac Vice Applicant maintains pro hac vice status in this case. The Court hereby sets a compliance hearing for 09/09/2027 at 01:30 PM in Department 18 at Rene C. Davidson Courthouse. If the renewal fee has been paid at least 10 calendar days before the hearing, no appearance will be required.

Defendant Walgreen's counsel must forthwith serve a copy of this order on all counsel of record and self-represented parties. The Court orders counsel to obtain a copy of this order from the eCourt portal.

CONTESTING THE TENTATIVE RULING: If the parties do not contest the tentative ruling, it will be adopted. Any party wishing to contest the tentative ruling must notify the court by email at Dept18@alameda.courts.ca.gov, and notify all opposing counsel or unrepresented parties by 4pm the day before the hearing.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share