DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC23609187·sf·Civil·Discovery
Hearing 8 months agoGRANTED

PAUL VON WIEDENFIELD ET AL VS. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion To Seal

Hearing date
Dec 18, 2025
Department
301
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffPAUL VON WIEDENFIELD
DefendantREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
DefendantABBOTT LABORATORIES
DefendantABBOTT VASCULAR INC.
DefendantABBOTT VASCULAR SOLUTIONS INC.

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Law & Motion / Discovery Dept 301 - CGC23609187 - December 18, 2025 Hearing date: December 18, 2025 Case number: CGC23609187 Case title: PAUL VON WIEDENFIELD ET AL VS. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA ET AL Case Number: | | CGC23609187 | Case Title: | | PAUL VON WIEDENFIELD ET AL VS. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-12-18 09:00 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion To Seal | Rulings: | | On the Law and Motion/Discovery calendar for December 18, 2025, line 4. DEFENDANTS ABBOTT LABORATORIES, ABBOTT VASCULAR INC., ABBOTT VASCULAR SOLUTIONS INC.'S Motion To Seal.

Disclosure: Judge Van Aken discloses that her spouse is employed as a tenured professor at a UC campus. He has no connection to the events of this case. Disqualification is not required in this circumstance and the court concludes that a reasonable person aware of the facts would not reasonably entertain a doubt that the judge would be able to be impartial. (See Rothman, California Judicial Conduct Handbook (4th ed. 2017) 7:46 at pp. 464-465; CCP 170.1(a)(6)(A)(iii).)

Tentative Ruling: Hearing required for disclosure on the record. The court's tentative is to grant the unopposed motion to seal. Because the materials sought to be sealed were filed in connection with a discovery motion, no further findings are required.

For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 301 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 301 Zoom ID 161 502 4290; Passcode 700956.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.

Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept301tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.

The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion or Discovery Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(301/CVA) | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share