DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC25277298·sf·Civil·Asbestos
Hearing 8 months agoGRANTED

ROY EDWARD ABENDROTH VS. 3M COMPANY ET AL

MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY OF RECORD

Hearing date
Dec 9, 2025
Department
304
Judge
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffROY EDWARD ABENDROTH
Defendant3M COMPANY ET AL
DefendantMartin Himmel, Inc.

Attorneys

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Asbestos Law & Motion - CGC25277298 - December 9, 2025 Hearing date: December 9, 2025 Case number: CGC25277298 Case title: ROY EDWARD ABENDROTH VS. 3M COMPANY ET AL Case Number: | | CGC25277298 | Case Title: | | ROY EDWARD ABENDROTH VS. 3M COMPANY ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-12-09 09:00 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY OF RECORD | Rulings: | | On Asbestos Law and Motion Calendar for Tuesday, December 9, 2025, in Department 304, Line 3.

Christine D. Calareso, Esq., filed a Motion to be Relieved as Counsel for Defendant, Martin Himmel, Inc. No opposition filed. A hearing is required.

The moving party shall lodge with the clerk in Department 304 by the time set for this hearing a proposed order on the mandatory judicial council form (MC-053). If a hearing is requested, it will be on December 9, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. Attorneys may appear in person or remotely via zoom: Meeting ID 160 757 8308; Passcode: 485029. Face coverings are optional.

The Court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law and Motion department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: Their name, CSR and telephone number, and their individual work email address. There will be only one official record. If the parties cannot agree, the Court will designate a qualified court reporter to provide the official transcript for the matter, and the party or parties will bear the cost. = (304/EPS) | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share