DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC25631304·sf·Civil·Real Property / Housing
Hearing todayDENIED

MANITOU, INC, DBA EASY BREEZY VS. LAFAYETTE LAND COMPANY, LLC

Motion To Set Aside Default

Hearing date
Aug 24, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffMANITOU, INC, DBA EASY BREEZY
DefendantLAFAYETTE LAND COMPANY, LLC

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC25631304 - August 24, 2026 Hearing date: August 24, 2026 Case number: CGC25631304 Case title: MANITOU, INC, DBA EASY BREEZY VS. LAFAYETTE LAND COMPANY, LLC Case Number: | | CGC25631304 | Case Title: | | MANITOU, INC, DBA EASY BREEZY VS. LAFAYETTE LAND COMPANY, LLC | Court Date: | | 2026-08-24 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Motion To Set Aside Default | Rulings: | | On the Real Property/Housing Court Motion calendar for August 24, 2026, line 6.

Defendant's Motion to Set Aside Default is DENIED. Moving party fails to establish entitlement for relief under CCP 473(d) or 473.5. Unauthorized supplemental brief filed on August 14, 2026, is stricken. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share