Calderon, et al. v. Children's Hospital Los Angeles, et al.
Applications for Pro Hac Vice Admission (2x)
Motion type
Parties
Attorneys
Ruling
Case No.: 26STCV18525 Matter: Applications for Pro Hac Vice Admission (2x) Moving Party: Plaintiffs Josue Calderon and Lisbeth Calderon Parreno. Responding Party: Unopposed Notice: OK
Ruling: The Application of Groffsky is granted. The Application of Dalrymple requires clarification. Moving party to give notice. The Court encourages all parties to appear remotely via LA CourtConnect. If submitting on the Court's tentative ruling, please follow the instructions provided above. Plaintiffs Josue Calderon and Lisbeth Calderon Parreno seek pro hac vice admission for Richard Groffsky and Micaela Dalrymple. The Application of Groffsky is granted because it meets all requirements of Cal.
Rules of Court, Rule 9.40. The Application of Dalrymple requires clarification because it appears this is the 6th time counsel is moving for pro hac vice admission within the last 2 years, although two cases are listed twice. (Rule 9.4(b) ["Absent special circumstances, repeated appearances by any person under this rule is a cause for denial of an application."].) Dalrymple should explain her circumstances at the hearing. Moving party to give notice. | Home -->)" -->
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”