| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ORDER FOR SALE OF PRPERTY SHOULD NOT BE MADE
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC22597547 - May 19, 2026 Hearing date: May 19, 2026 Case number: CGC22597547 Case title: 638 MINNA STREET OWNERS ASSOCIATION, A CALIFORNIA VS. STEPHEN MICHELLA ET AL Case Number: | | CGC22597547 | Case Title: | | 638 MINNA STREET OWNERS ASSOCIATION, A CALIFORNIA VS. STEPHEN MICHELLA ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-05-19 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ORDER FOR SALE OF PRPERTY SHOULD NOT BE MADE | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for May 19, 2026. Line 1.
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ORDER FOR SALE OF PRPERTY SHOULD NOT BE MADE is OFF CALENDAR. Service defective or untimely.
Per the OSC issued on April 17, 2026, Judgment Creditor was to serve a (i) copy of the OSC, (ii) the Application for Order, and (iii) the Notice of Hearing, on Judgment Debtors and their attorney of record, personally or by mail, and by electronic service. Service and posting of these documents was ordered to be accomplished at least 30 days before the date of the hearing.
The Proof of Service filed on April 23, 2026 shows service of the Application and OSC on April 19, 2026 by electronic service on Stephen Michella and on Colleen Quigley's Counsel, but not on Colleen Quigley herself. In addition, the Notice of Hearing was untimely electronically served on May 5, 2026. The OSC also required personal service or mailed service of all the documents. Neither Judgement Debtors nor the attorney of record was served by mail or personally.
Although the Proof of Service filed on April 23, 2026 regarding posting/personal service suggests that Stephen Michella and Colleen Quigley were personally served with the OSC (only) on April 19 at the Subject Property, this is undermined by the supplemental declaration of Andrew Dodson wherein he states that the Judgment Debtors have not observed "at the Subject Property at all this year or last and there is no record of them using their electronic key fobs to enter." (Dodson decl. 3.) =(501/DWH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”