638 MINNA STREET OWNERS ASSOCIATION, A CALIFORNIA VS. STEPHEN MICHELLA ET AL
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ORDER FOR SALE OF PROPERTY SHOULD NOT BE MADE
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC22597547 - February 24, 2026 Hearing date: February 24, 2026 Case number: CGC22597547 Case title: 638 MINNA STREET OWNERS ASSOCIATION, A CALIFORNIA VS. STEPHEN MICHELLA ET AL Case Number: | | CGC22597547 | Case Title: | | 638 MINNA STREET OWNERS ASSOCIATION, A CALIFORNIA VS. STEPHEN MICHELLA ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-02-24 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ORDER FOR SALE OF PROPERTY SHOULD NOT BE MADE | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for February 24, 2026. Line 3. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ORDER FOR SALE OF PROPERTY SHOULD NOT BE MADE per ex parte order Hearing Required.
No later than 9:00 a.m. on February 24, 2026 moving party to file and serve a supplemental declaration (hard courtesy copy to be delivered to department 501) addressing the following: (1) the propriety of reliance on 20-month old appraisal; (2) the propriety of service of the OSC on "Chirag Patel," not an attorney of record for Judgement Debtor; (3) the operative dates of the bankruptcy stay (See page 8, item 16 of the Litigation Sale Guarantee issued by Chicago Title Insurance Company). =(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”