DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CV002684·sacramento·Civil·Class Action — Wage & Hour
Hearing 10 months agoCONTINUED

ENRIQUEZ vs BOEING AEROSPACE OPERATIONS, INC., et al.

Case Management Conference

Hearing date
Oct 17, 2025
Department
23
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jan 16, 2026
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffENRIQUEZ
DefendantBOEING AEROSPACE OPERATIONS, INC.

Ruling

25CV002684: ENRIQUEZ vs BOEING AEROSPACE OPERATIONS, INC., et al. 10/17/2025 Case Management Conference in Department 23

Tentative Ruling

NO APPEARANCE REQUIRED

*Due to the Court’s unavailability on October 17, 2025, oral argument will be heard on October 31, 2025, at 10:30 a.m. if argument is requested."

The Parties are currently meeting and conferring on a stipulation to allow Plaintiff to file a second amended complaint and written discovery. Defendant asserts that due to Plaintiff’s status as an exempt employee, he cannot adequately represent the class as proposed, requiring amendments to the complaint. The Parties request a continuance for 90 days to allow the Parties to exhaust informal efforts to resolve any disputes without motion practice.

This hearing is continued to January 16, 2026 at 10:30 a.m.

To request oral argument on this matter, you must call Department 23 at (916) 874-5754 by 4:00 p.m., the court day before this hearing and notification of oral argument must be made to the opposing party/counsel. If no call is made, the tentative ruling becomes the order of the court. (Local Rule 1.06.)

Please check your tentative ruling prior to the next Court date at www.saccourt.ca.gov prior to the above referenced hearing date.

If oral argument is requested, the parties may appear by Zoom with the links below:

To join by Zoom link – https://saccourt-ca-gov.zoomgov.com/my/sscdept23 To join by Room: Dept23a To join by phone dial (833) 568-8864 / ID: 16108301121

Parties requesting services of a court reporter will need to arrange for private court reporter services at their own expense, pursuant to Government code §68086 and California Rules of Court, Rule 2.956. Requirements for requesting a court reporter are listed in the Policy for Official Reporter Pro Tempore available on the Sacramento Superior Court website at https://www.saccourt.ca.gov/court-reporters/docs/crtrp-6a.pdf. Parties may contact Court- Approved Official Reporters Pro Tempore by utilizing the list of Court Approved Official Reporters Pro Tempore available at https://www.saccourt.ca.gov/court-reporters/docs/crtrp- 13.Pdf

25CV002684: ENRIQUEZ vs BOEING AEROSPACE OPERATIONS, INC., et al. 10/17/2025 Case Management Conference in Department 23

A Stipulation and Appointment of Official Reporter Pro Tempore (CV/E-206) is required to be signed by each party, the private court reporter, and the Judge prior to the hearing, if not using a reporter from the Court’s Approved Official Reporter Pro Tempore list, Once the form is signed it must be filed with the clerk.

If a litigant has been granted a fee waiver and requests a court reporter, the party must submit a Request for Court Reporter by a Party with a Fee Waiver (CV/E-211) and it must be filed with the clerk at least 10 days prior to the hearing or at the time the proceeding is scheduled if less than 10 days away. Once approved, the clerk will be forward the form to the Court Reporter’s Office and an official reporter will be provided.

Counsel for Plaintiff is directed to notice all parties of this order.

Case Management Conference is scheduled for 01/16/2026 at 10:30 AM in Department 23 at Gordon D. Schaber Superior Court.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share