DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
34-2022-00324254-CU-OE-GDS·sacramento·Civil·Employment
Hearing over 1 year agoCONTINUED

Jaime Farias vs. Labor Resource Group, Inc

Case Management Conference

Hearing date
Dec 6, 2024
Department
22
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Feb 14, 2025
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffJaime Farias
DefendantLabor Resource Group, Inc

Ruling

34-2022-00324254-CU-OE-GDS: Jaime Farias vs. Labor Resource Group, Inc 12/06/2024 Case Management Conference in Department 22

Tentative Ruling

The Court has read and considered the Joint Case Management Statement filed by the parties and now issues the following tentative ruling:

NO APPEARANCE REQUIRED. The Court sets a further CMC as set forth below.

The parties shall file and email to the department a Joint Case Management Statement no later than 15 calendar days prior to the next CMC.

Please check your tentative ruling prior to the next Court date at www.saccourt.ca.gov prior to the above referenced hearing date.

Please note that the Complex Civil Case Department now provides information to assist you in managing your complex case on the Court website at https://www.saccourt.ca.gov/civil/complex-civil-cases.aspx. The Court strongly encourages parties to review this website regularly to stay abreast of the most recent complex civil case procedures. Please refer to the website before directly contacting the Court Clerk for information.

On the Court's own motion, the Case Management Conference scheduled for 12/06/2024 is continued to 02/14/2025 at 10:30 AM in Department 22 at Gordon D. Schaber Superior Court.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share