DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
30-2025-01537296-CU-PA-CJC·orange·Civil·Personal Injury
Hearing todayGRANTED

Sepulveda vs. Reznick

Motion to be Relieved as Counsel of Record

Hearing date
Aug 21, 2026
Department
C31
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffFermin Sepulveda

Attorneys

Lessing C. Solov(Solov & Teitell, a P.C.)for Plaintiff

Ruling

“Civility allows for zealous representation, reduces clients’ costs, better advances clients’ interests, reduces stress, increases professional satisfaction, and promotes effective conflict resolution. These guidelines foster the civility and professionalism that are hallmarks of the best traditions of the legal profession.” OCBA Civility Guidelines

“The American legal profession exists to help people resolve disputes cheaply, swiftly, fairly, and justly. Incivility between counsel is sand in the gears.” (Karton v. Ari Design & Construction, Inc. (2021) 61 Cal.App.5th 734, 747.)

TENTATIVE RULINGS Judge Kimberly Knill, Dept. C31

• The court encourages remote appearances to save time, reduce costs, and increase public safety. Go to Check-In Results - Orange County Superior Court and click the blue box, “Click here to appear/check-in for Civil Small Claims/Limited/Unlimited/Complex remote proceedings.” Navigate to Department C31 Judge Kimberly Knill.

• All hearings are open to the public.

• If you desire a transcript of the proceedings, you must provide your court reporter (unless you have a fee waiver and request a court reporter in advance).

• Call the other side. If everyone submits to the tentative ruling, call the clerk at 657- 622-5231. Otherwise, the court may rule differently at the hearing. (See Lewis v. Fletcher Jones Motor Cars, Inc. (2012) 205 Cal.App.4th 436, 442, fn. 1.)

No filming, broadcasting, photography, or electronic recording of the video session is permitted pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 1.150, and Orange County Superior Court rule 180.

HEARING DATE: Friday, 8/21/2026 10:00 AM

# Case Name Tentative 1 Estrada vs. Motion to be Relieved as Counsel of Record Segade 30-2022- The motion of attorney Sasha Tymkowicz to withdraw as 01292722-CU- attorney of record for Plaintiff Monica Margarita Esrada is PA-CJC DENIED. (Code Civ. Proc., § 284, Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1362.)

Counsel failed to demonstrate service. The declaration filed in support of this Motion does not attest to the manner of service and the proof of service does not show service on Plaintiff.

Clerk to give notice.

2 Sepulveda vs. Motion to be Relieved as Counsel of Record Reznick

30-2025- The motion of attorney Lessing C. Solov from Solov & 01537296-CU- Teitell, a P.C., to be relieved as counsel of record for PA-CJC plaintiff Fermin Sepulveda is GRANTED.

Moving attorney has shown compliance with all the requirements of the California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1362.

Moving attorney is ORDERED to give notice to client, and file proof of service of the Court’s order as entered.

Withdrawal will be effective upon filing of proof of service of the order.

3 Hansei Motion to Vacate Dismissal Solutions, LLC. vs. Better Soul, Plaintiff Hansei Solutions, LLC’s unopposed motion to Inc. vacate the dismissal of the fifth and sixth causes of action 30-2024- in the First Amended Complaint entered on 3/6/2026 01404393-CU- (ROA 52) is GRANTED. BC-CJC Plaintiff has demonstrated the request for dismissal was due to Plaintiff’s counsel’s mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or neglect. (Code Civ. Proc.§ 473, subd. (b).)

The dismissal of the fifth and sixth causes of action in the First Amended Complaint entered on 3/6/2026 (ROA 52) is VACATED.

Clerk to give notice.

4 Espinoza Aceves Motion to Consolidate Cases vs. Southern California Edison Defendant/cross-complainant Southern California Edison Company Company’s (SCE) motion to consolidate is DENIED. 30-2024- 01436382-CU- SCE moves to consolidate the following cases for all PO-CJC purposes:

(1) Jonhathan Espinoza Aceves v. Southern California Edison Company, et al., case number 2024-01436382 (Aceves) (2) KF Properties, Inc. v. Brightview Landscapes, LLC, case number 2025-01494489 (KF Properties); and (3) Southern California Edison Company v. Brightview Landscape Services, Inc., et al., case number 2025- 01534849 (SCE)

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share