DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CV-0229·slo·Civil·Discovery Dispute
Hearing todayCONTINUED

Rebecca Gamboa v. Pismo Sands RV Resort, LLC, et al.

Motion to Compel Further Responses to Form Interrogatories; Motion to Compel Further Responses to Special Interrogatories; Motion to Compel Further Responses to Request for Production of Documents

Hearing date
Aug 20, 2026
Department
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Dec 31, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Further Responses rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffRebecca Gamboa
DefendantPismo Sands RV Resort, LLC

Ruling

Rebecca Gamboa v. Pismo Sands RV Resort, LLC, et al., 25CV-0229

Hearing: (1) Motion to Compel Further Responses to Form Interrogatories (2) Motion to Compel Further Responses to Special Interrogatories (3) Motion to Compel Further Responses to Request for Production of Documents

Date: August 20, 2026

Pismo Sands RV Resort, LLC filed motions to compel Plaintiff to serve further responses to Form Interrogatories, Special Interrogatories, and Request for Production of Documents, and for monetary sanctions.

No opposition is currently on file. However, the proof of service for the motion and supporting documents was filed concurrently with the motion and therefore could not have included the hearing date and time. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1110, subd. (b); Local Rule 7.05.1 [hearing information added by the Clerk’s Office at the time of filing].) Pismo Sands RV Resort, LLC failed to file proof that a notice containing the date and time of the hearing was served. Notice is therefore deficient.

The court shall continue the hearing on this matter to December 31, 2026. Pismo Sands RV Resort, LLC’s counsel shall serve notice of the continued hearing date.

1

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share