DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
23PR000045·napa·Civil·Trust Administration
Hearing todayCONTINUED

In the Matter of Revocable Trust of Beverly J. Kastan est. 3/11/2011

CONFERENCE STATUS; PETITION FOR ORDER INVALIDATING TRUST AND DETERMINING OWNERSHIP OF TRUST PROPERTY BY ESTATE; OBJECTIONS TO ACCOUNTING OF TRUSTEE

Hearing date
Aug 20, 2026
Department
Dept. B
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Parties

OtherBeverly J. Kastan

Ruling

Based on the foregoing, Mr. Delgado’s request for an award of attorneys’ fees is GRANTED IN PART. Mr. Delgado is awarded attorneys’ fees in the amount of $4,050.

PROBATE CALENDAR – Hon. Joseph J. Solga, Dept. B (Historic Courthouse) at 8:30 a.m.

In the Matter of Revocable Trust of Beverly J. Kastan est. 3/11/2011 23PR000045

[1] CONFERENCE STATUS

[2] PETITION FOR ORDER INVALIDATING TRUST AND DETERMINING OWNERSHIP OF TRUST PROPERTY BY ESTATE (filed February 16, 2023)

[3] OBJECTIONS TO ACCOUNTING OF TRUSTEE; PETITION FOR ORDER DIRECTING TRUSTEE TO FILE AMENDED ACCOUNTING; AND PETITION FOR ORDER DIRECTING ATTORNEY-IN-FACT TO FILE ACCOUNTING (filed October 10, 2023)

APPEARANCE REQUIRED

Estate of Marilyn Louise Quint 23PR000119

FIRST AND FINAL REPORT OF ADMINISTRATOR AND PETITION FOR ITS SETTLEMENT, FOR ALLOWANCE OF STATUTORY COMPENSATION TO ADMINISTRATOR AND ATTORNEYS AND FOR FINAL DISTRIBUTION

TENTATIVE RULING: The matter is CONTINUED to September 17, 2026 at 8:30 a.m. in Dept. B to allow Administrator to address the following issue. There appears to be an error in Schedule C of Exhibit B attached to the Petition. (See Pet., PDF pp. 19-20.) Schedule C indicates a total amount of disbursements of $583,909.23 (= $564,466 on p. 19 + $19,443.23 on p. 20). However, the Petition and Summary of Account both indicate a total amount of disbursements of $592,531.99. (See Pet., p. 3 ln. 9, p. 13 (Exh. B).)

Conservatorship of Dustin Farfan Hernandez 25PR000111

REVIEW – 1ST YEAR

TENTATIVE RULING: After a review of the matter, the Court finds the Co- Conservators are acting in the best interest of the Conservatee. Thus, the matter is set for a Review – Biennial hearing in two years, on August 22, 2028, at 8:30 a.m. in Dept. B. The Court Investigator shall prepare a biennial investigator report for the next hearing date. The Clerk is directed to send notice to the parties.

9

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share