DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CVMV2406343·riverside·Civil·Stipulated Settlement Enforcement
Hearing todayGRANTED

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK N.A. VS LLOYD

MOTION TO VACATE DISMISSAL 664.6 AND ENTRY JUDGMENT UNDER TERMS OF STIPULATION SETTLEMENT

Hearing date
Aug 20, 2026
Department
MV1
Judge
Prevailing
Moving Party
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$5,734.79

Parties

PlaintiffJPMORGAN CHASE BANK N.A.
DefendantLLOYD

Ruling

1. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME HEARING ON MOTION TO VACATE DISMISSAL 664.6 AND ENTRY JPMORGAN CHASE BANK CVMV2406343 JUDGMENT UNDER TERMS OF N.A. VS LLOYD STIPULATION SETTLEMENT BY JPMORGAN CHASE BANK N.A. Tentative Ruling: Granted.

The dismissal is set aside, and judgment shall enter in the amount of $5,734.79.

2. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME HEARING ON MOTION TO VACATE DISMISSAL 664.6 AND ENTRY BANK OF AMERICA N.A. VS CVMV2407258 JUDGMENT UNDER TERMS OF SAUCEDO STIPULATION SETTLEMENT BY BANK OF AMERICA N.A. Tentative Ruling: Granted.

The dismissal is set aside, and judgment shall enter in the amount of $3,131.20.

3. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME DEMURRER ON 1ST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR BREACH OF MORGAN VS PACIFIC CONTRACT/WARRANTY (OVER SPECIALTY INSURANCE CVMV2510340 $10,000 DOES NOT EXCEED $35,000) COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA OF TIYIESHA MORGAN BY PACIFIC CORPORATION SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION Tentative Ruling: No tentative ruling.

Appearance is required.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share