DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26CV1253·eldorado·Civil·Minor’s Compromise
Hearing about 1 month agoGRANTED

MATTER OF MELVIN DZUL LOPEZ

Petition for Minor’s Compromise

Hearing date
Jul 17, 2026
Department
Unknown
Judge
Prevailing
Moving Party
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Parties

PetitionerMelvin Dzul Lopez

Ruling

LAW AND MOTION CALENDAR JULY 17, 2026

4. MATTER OF MELVIN DZUL LOPEZ, 26CV1253

Petition for Minor’s Compromise (See Related Item Nos. 2 & 3)

This is a petition to confirm a (pre-litigation) minor’s compromise arising from a

personal injury claim. Two other minors involved in the same incident concurrently filed

petitions to confirm their proposed settlements.

As shown in the notice of related case filed April 30, 2026, there is a pending lawsuit

in the related case, Caamal, et al. v. Xicumku, et al. (El Dorado Super. Ct., Case

No. 21CV0256). The court notes that formal notice of the petition is not required. (Pearson v.

Superior Court (2012) 202 Cal.App.4th 1333, 1337, fn. 2 [“Neither [Code of Civil

Procedure] section 372 nor the California Rules of Court ... contemplates a noticed

motion and adversary hearing when court approval of a minor’s compromise is

sought.”].)

Having reviewed and considered the petition, the court approves the minor’s

compromise.

TENTATIVE RULING # 4: ABSENT OBJECTION, PETITION GRANTED AS REQUESTED.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share