Khaytovich vs. Locascio
Motion to be relieved as counsel of record
Motion type
Parties
Attorneys
Ruling
request access to the Property, but Petitioner has been unable to obtain access to the Property. (Janes Decl., ¶ 17, Exh. 10; Simon Decl., ¶ 2.) Petitioner thus has shown it is entitled to the relief requested under Civil Code section 2929.5, subdivision (d). Based on the foregoing, the motion is GRANTED. The court will sign the proposed order submitted by Petitioner. Counsel for Petitioner is ordered to give notice of this ruling.
5. Khaytovich vs. Locascio 2022-01239428 Before the court is the motion of attorney Charles Gomez or Gomez Law, APC, to be relieved as counsel of record for defendant Brandon LoCascio (Client). The motion was properly served on all parties and Client, it establishes grounds for the withdrawal of counsel, and otherwise complies with the requirements of California Rules of Court, rule 3.1362. Accordingly, the motion is GRANTED. The order relieves counsel shall be effective upon counsel filing with the court a proof of service showing the signed order granting the motion was served on Client. Counsel is ordered to submit a revised proposed order that accurately reflects all future dates. Counsel further is ordered to give notice of this ruling to all parties and Client.
6. In Re: Monarch Bay Terrace Property Owners Association 2026-01547636 Please check back later for a tentative ruling on this matter.
7. G. vs. Santa Ana Unified School District 2026-01576260 Before the court is the petition of petitioner N.G., by and through his guardian ad litem Margarita Flores (Petitioner), for relief from Government Code section 945.4 pursuant to Government Code section 946.6. As more fully set forth below, the petition is GRANTED. On December 19, 2026, Petitioner mailed by certified mail, return receipt requested, a notice of claim to respondent Santa Ana Unified School District (District), Office of the Superintendent. Although this claim was timely submitted, Petitioner’s attorney’s office addressed and mailed the claim to the District at “1601 E. 17th Street” when it should have been addressed and mailed to the District at “1601 E.
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”