DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26-01542885·orange·Civil·Civil
Hearing in about 3 hours

Beijing Luode Property Management Co., Ltd. vs. Qin

Motion for Attorney Fees; Motion to Dismiss

Hearing date
Aug 21, 2026
Department
C12
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Attorney Fees rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffBeijing Luode Property Management Co., Ltd.
DefendantQin

Ruling

Motions to Compel Responses to Special interrogatories and Requests for Production, and Motion to Deem Matters Admitted

Defendant Sub-Zero Excavating, Inc.’s motions to compel responses to its first sets of special interrogatories and requests for production, and to deem the matters admitted in its first set of requests for admission, are DENIED AS MOOT to the extent they seek an order compelling responses or deeming matters admitted.

Plaintiff Alberto Palomera Coronado served verified responses to the requests for admission roughly 1.5 hours after these motions were filed (see Hanassab Decl. ¶¶ 11-12, Ex. A [email serving the responses at 3:51 p.m. on 4/7/26]), and served verified responses to the special interrogatories and requests for production on 8/10/26. (Id. ¶ 20, Ex. C.)

Sanctions remain at issue. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1348(a).)

Sanctions are GRANTED in the total amount of $4,980 (or $1,660 per motion) against plaintiff only, payable within 30 days of notice. (See Code Civ. Proc., §§ 2030.290, subd. (c), 2031.300, subd. (c), 2033.280, subd. (c).)

The Case Management Conference is CONTINUED to January 14, 2027, at 9:30 a.m. in Department C12.

Defendant Sub-Zero shall give notice of all of the above.

6. Beijing Luode Property Management Co., Ltd. vs. Qin

26-01542885

1. Motion for Attorney Fees 2. Motion to Dismiss

7. Tran vs. Ali Sadeghi M.D. Inc.

25-01509640

Motion to Enforce Settlement

Plaintiff Hannah Khanh Tran’s motion to enforce settlement is GRANTED, in the amount of $126.04 in unpaid interest. (Code Civ. Proc., § 664.6 [authorizing motion]; Ex. A to moving papers, §§ 2, 15.) Moving party is also granted $2,910.00 in fees and costs. (Osumi v. Sutton (2007) 151 Cal.App.4th 1355, 1361 [fees/costs authorized if provided for in settlement agreement]; Ex. A to moving papers, § 15.)

Moving party has shown that one of the two initial payments due, in the amount of $20,000.00, was not paid by its initial due date, nor by

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share