DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
VCU313083·tulare-civil·Civil·Withdrawal of Counsel
Hearing todayDENIED

Sams Gas & Food, Inc. vs. Ahmed, Shaibi

Plaintiff's Counsel's Motion to Withdraw as Counsel

Hearing date
Aug 20, 2026
Department
1
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Nov 5, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffSams Gas & Food, Inc.
PlaintiffGhassan Ahmed
DefendantShaibi Ahmed

Attorneys

Brian N. Folland(The Folland Law Group)for Plaintiff

Ruling

Case No.: VCU313083 Date: August 20, 2026 Time: 8:30 A.M. Dept. 1-The Honorable David C. Mathias Motion: Plaintiff's Counsel's Motion to Withdraw as Counsel Tentative Ruling: To deny the motion without prejudice; CMC is continued to November 5, 2026; 8:30 am; D1.

Facts On July 7, 2026, Plaintiff's Counsel Brian N. Folland, filed a motion to be relieved as counsel as to Plaintiff Ghassan Ahmed. Plaintiff's Counsel filed the following with respect to withdrawing: (1) MC-051 - Notice of Motion and Motion to be Relieved as Counsel; (2) MC-052 - Declaration in Support of Attorney's Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel; and (3) MC-053 - Order Granting Attorney's Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel Additionally, Plaintiff's Counsel has filed proofs of service of these documents by mail.

Authority and Analysis Code of Civil Procedure section 284 provides that "[t]he attorney in an action or special proceeding may be changed at any time before or after judgment of final determination, as follows: 1. Upon the consent of both client

and attorney, filed with the clerk, or entered upon the minutes; [or] 2. Upon the order of the court, upon the application of either client or attorney, after notice from one to the other."

California Rule of Court 3.1362(a) requires that the "notice of motion and motion to be relieved as counsel under Code of Civil Procedure section 284(2) must be directed to the client and must be made on the Notice of Motion and Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel-Civil (form MC-051)." As noted above, counsel has complied with California Rule of Court 3.1362(a) by submitting the notice and motion on MC-051 and by directing the notice and motion to Plaintiff.

California Rule of Court 3.1362 (c) further mandates that: "The motion to be relieved as counsel must be accompanied by a declaration on the Declaration in Support of Attorney's Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel--Civil (form MC-052). The declaration must state in general terms and without compromising the confidentiality of the attorney-client relationship why a motion under Code of Civil Procedure section 284(2) is brought instead of filing a consent under Code of Civil Procedure section 284(1). Specifically, the declaration that Rule 3.1362(c) requires must state that the moving attorney attempted to secure a "Substitution of Attorney" from the client as required under Code of Civil Procedure section 284(1) and that the client refused to so stipulate.

Here, the declaration is properly made on form MC-052 and uses general terms without compromising confidentiality, but does not indicate that counsel attempted to obtain a substitution by consent prior to making this motion. The Court interprets the phrase "In a good faith attempts to resolve the matter, The Folland Law Group has reached out to the client multiple times" as related to the "breakdown of the working relationship with the client and non-payment for services and costs rendered" as opposed to a refusal to substitute present counsel. Absent this information, the Court cannot grant the motion.

Next, service under Rule 3.1362(d) requires personal service, electronic service, or mail and counsel's declaration must note the service made. Here, service was by mail on July 9, 2026. The declaration of counsel indicates that Plaintiff's address was confirmed as current via telephone and conversation.

Finally, Rule 3.1362(e) requires the proposed order be lodged with the Court on MC-053 with the moving papers, specifying all hearing dates scheduled, including date of trial. Counsel has complied with this requirement.

The Court denies, without prejudice, Counsel's Motion to Withdraw as to Plaintiff based upon the lack of compliance with California Rule of Court 3.1362(c) with respect to attempting to obtain a "Substitution of Attorney" prior to moving to withdraw and reflecting such efforts in the declaration.

If no one requests oral argument, under Code of Civil Procedure section 1019.5(a) and California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312(a), no further written order is necessary. The minute order adopting this tentative ruling will become the order of the court and service by the clerk will constitute notice of the order.

Court reporters are usually not available for law and motion matters in the civil division. The parties and counsel must provide their own reporter if they want a transcript of the proceedings. Re: Amezola, Carlos vs. Kawneer Company, Inc.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share