DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
23STCV14931·la·Civil·Default Judgment
Hearing todayGRANTED

Hyungsoo Kim v. Suk Joo Lee

Plaintiff's Request for Default Judgment

Hearing date
Aug 20, 2026
Department
508
Prevailing
Plaintiff
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$256,929.32$235,000.00$679.32$21,250.00

Parties

PlaintiffHyungsoo Kim
DefendantSuk Joo Lee

Ruling

(Stanley Mosk Courthouse: Dept. 508) August 20, 2026 DEPARTMENT 508 LAW AND MOTION RULINGS

THE SUMMARY JUDGMENT BINDERS. THE COURT WILL DISCUSS A NEW HEARING DATE SO THE BINDERS CAN BE DELIVERED TO DEPT. 508. Case Number: 23STCV14931 Hearing Date: August 20, 2026 Dept: 508 Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles Department 508 HYUNGSOO KIM, Plaintiff, vs. SUK JOO LEE, Defendant. | Case No.: |

| Hearing Date: | August 20, 2026 | Hearing Time: | 8:30 a.m. | ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT | Background Plaintiff Hyungsoo Kim ("Plaintiff") requests entry of default judgment against Defendant Suk Joo Lee in the total amount of $256,929.32, comprising $235,000.00 as demanded in the first amended complaint, $ 6 79.32 in costs, and $21,250.00 in attorney fees. The Court finds that Plaintiff sufficiently supported his request with the submitted evidence and declarations. Accordingly, the Court grants Plaintiff's request and will sign the judgment.

No appearance is necessary at the hearing on this matter. DATED: August 20, 2026 ________________________________ Hon. Teresa A. Beaudet Judge, Los Angeles Superior Court Case Number: 25STCV21759 Hearing Date: August 20, 2026 Dept: 508 Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles Department 508 WESTLAKE SERVICES, LLC, Plaintiff, vs. CARLOS ROCA, Defendant. | Case No.: | 25STCV21759 | Hearing Date: | August 20, 2026 | Hearing Time: | 8:30 a.m. | ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT | Background Plaintiff Westlake Services, LLC ("Plaintiff") requests entry of default judgment against Defendant Carlos Roca in the amount of $1,975,088.51, comprising $1,678,063.79 as demanded in the complaint, $277,685.08 in interest, $669.00 in costs, and $18,670.64 in attorney fees. The Court finds that Plaintiff sufficiently supported its request with the

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share