DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
23STCV21437·la·Civil·Default Judgment
Hearing todayGRANTED

Sook Hee Lee v. Rodrigo Perez, et al.

Plaintiff's Request for Default Judgment

Hearing date
Aug 18, 2026
Department
508
Prevailing
Plaintiff
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$37,350.26$27,897.00$8,090.76$862.50$500.00

Parties

PlaintiffSook Hee Lee
DefendantRodrigo Perez
DefendantSandra Ospina
DefendantFabio Gomez

Ruling

(Stanley Mosk Courthouse: Dept. 508) August 18, 2026 DEPARTMENT 508 LAW AND MOTION RULINGS

Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles Department 508 SOOK HEE LEE, Plaintiff, vs. RODRIGO PEREZ, et al., Defendants. | Case No.: |

| Hearing Date: | August 18, 2026 | Hearing Time: | 8:30 a.m. | ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT | Background Plaintiff Sook Hee Lee ("Plaintiff") requests entry of default judgment against Defendants Rodrigo Perez, Sandra Ospina, and Fabio Gomez (collectively, "Defendants"). Plaintiff seeks judgment in the amount of $37,350.26, comprising $27,897.00 in damages, $8,090.76 in interest, $862.50 in costs, and $500.00 in attorney fees. The Court finds that Plaintiff sufficiently supported its request with the submitted evidence and declarations. Accordingly, the Court grants Plaintiff's request and will sign the judgment. No appearance is necessary at the hearing on this matter.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share