GARY ERWIN VS. BRIDGE HOUSING CORPORATION ET AL
Notice Of Motion And Motion For Protective Order Regarding Notice Of Deposition Of Lisa Laffer And Request For Production Of Documents
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC25626859 - August 20, 2026 Hearing date: August 20, 2026 Case number: CGC25626859 Case title: GARY ERWIN VS. BRIDGE HOUSING CORPORATION ET AL Case Number: | | CGC25626859 | Case Title: | | GARY ERWIN VS. BRIDGE HOUSING CORPORATION ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-08-20 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion For Protective Order Regarding Notice Of Deposition Of Lisa Laffer And Request For Production Of Documents | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for August 20, 2026.
Line 3. DEFENDANT BRIDGE HOUSING CORPORATION, KEN LOMBARD, REBECCA HLEBASKO, COURTNEY MCGHEE, MAHADAYE LECOUNTE, LORAINE SEZAR, GREAT PRARIE RISK SOLUTIONS, KEN NOVACK Notice Of Motion And Motion For Protective Order Regarding Notice Of Deposition Of Lisa Laffer And Request For Production Of Documents is transferred to Department 301 to be heard at 9:00 a.m. on 8/28
Discovery motions and ex-parter application are heard in department 301 for odd-numbered general civil cases. =(501/SKF)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”