DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC25624689·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing 9 months agoTransferred to department 301

SARAH GEROME VS. SIDE, INC.

Notice Of Motion And Motion To Compel Further Discovery Responses And For Sanctions

Hearing date
Nov 26, 2025
Department
501
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Dec 11, 2025

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Further Responses rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffSARAH GEROME
DefendantSIDE, INC.

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC25624689 - November 26, 2025 Hearing date: November 26, 2025 Case number: CGC25624689 Case title: SARAH GEROME VS. SIDE, INC. Case Number: | | CGC25624689 | Case Title: | | SARAH GEROME VS. SIDE, INC. | Court Date: | | 2025-11-26 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion To Compel Further Discovery Responses And For Sanctions | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for November 26, 2025.

Line 1. PLAINTIFF SARAH GEROME Notice Of Motion And Motion To Compel Further Discovery Responses And For Sanctions is transferred to department 301 to be heard on December 11, 2025 at 9:00 a.m. All discovery motions in this action are to be heard in that department, per the Local Rules. =(501/HEK)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share