DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
22PR00181·santabarbara·Civil·Conservatorship
Hearing almost 3 years agoRecommended sanctions $300/day

Conservatorship of Edith M Edwards

Accounting, Compliance Review Hearing, Hearing, Order to Show Cause: Sanctions

Hearing date
Oct 4, 2023
Department
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Sanctions rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$300

Parties

PetitionerEdith M Edwards

Ruling

Case Number

Case Type Conservatorship Hearing Date / Time Wed, 10/04/2023 - 08:30 Nature of Proceedings Accounting, Compliance Review Hearing, Hearing, Order to Show Cause: Sanctions Tentative Ruling Probate Notes: Appearances required. Order to Show Cause

It is recommended the Court order sanctions in the amount of $300 per day until an accounting is filed. (Conservatorship of Farrant (2021) 67 Cal.App.5th 370, 374.) Final Accounting The Court ordered the Final Accounting to be filed by September 13, 2023. There is still no accounting on file. Conservatorship Compliance A Proof of Service - Notice of How to File Objection to I & A is still outstanding. Conservator must file a Proof of Service (Form GC-042) that this form was mailed to the conservatee, the conservatee's spouse, and the conservatee's parents and adult children or mailing excused by court. (Prob. Code, Sec. 2610) Appearances: The court is open to the public for court business. The court is also conducting hearings via Zoom videoconference. Meeting ID: 160 047 8568 Passcode: 9258167

Tentative Ruling: Darryl Genis et al v Daniel Genis et al Tentative Ruling: Darryl Genis et al v Daniel Genis et al

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share