DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26PR000101·napa·Civil·Conservatorship
Hearing todayAPPEARANCE REQUIRED

Conservatorship of Deirdre Combs

PETITION FOR APPOINTMENT OF PROBATE CONSERVATOR OF THE PERSON; PETITION FOR APPOINTMENT OF PROBATE CONSERVATOR OF THE ESTATE

Hearing date
Aug 19, 2026
Department
Dept. B
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Parties

OtherDeirdre Combs

Ruling

Conservatorship of Deirdre Combs 26PR000101

[1] PETITION FOR APPOINTMENT OF PROBATE CONSERVATOR OF THE PERSON

[2] PETITION FOR APPOINTMENT OF PROBATE CONSERVATOR OF THE ESTATE

APPEARANCE REQUIRED

CIVIL LAW & MOTION CALENDAR – Hon. Joseph J. Solga, Dept. B (Historic Courthouse) at 8:30 a.m.

Fedex Corporate Services, Inc. v. Wine Specialty Services LLC 23CV001063

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT

TENTATIVE RULING: The motion is GRANTED.

The moving party failed to include in the notice of this motion proper notice of the Court’s tentative ruling system as required by Local Rule 2.9. Moving party is directed to immediately provide, by telephone call AND email, the missing notice to opposing party/ies forthwith. The requirements for requesting oral argument under Local Rule 2.9 remain in effect. However, the Court may grant belated requests for oral argument or continuance of hearing, made by any party who represents it did not timely receive the required notice, regardless of whether or not moving party is present at the hearing.

Plaintiff Fedex Corporate Services, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) moves, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6,1 for an order enforcing the Stipulation for Entry of Judgment & Conditional Dismissal Under CCP 664.6 (“Settlement Agreement”) and entry of judgment in accordance with the terms of the Settlement Agreement between Plaintiff and Defendant Wine Specialty Services, LLC (“Defendant”).

The matter originally came on for hearing on August 5, 2026. The Court posted a Tentative Ruling the day prior, in which it continued the matter and directed Plaintiff to file an Amended Memorandum and Declaration to correct or otherwise explain an apparent error in the moving papers filed on June 24, 2026. After the Tentative Ruling was posted, Plaintiff filed the Amended Memorandum and Declaration correcting the error.

“If parties to pending litigation stipulate, in a writing signed by the parties outside of the presence of the court or orally before the court, for settlement of the case, or part thereof, the court, upon motion, may enter judgment pursuant to the terms of the settlement.” (§ 664.6, subd. (a).)

From the evidence presented by Plaintiff, the Court finds as follows:

1 All subsequent statutory references are to the Code of Civil Procedure unless otherwise specified.

4

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share