DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26PR000046·napa·Civil·Conservatorship
Hearing 9 days agoAPPEARANCE REQUIRED

Conservatorship of Merrily Wilkinson

PETITION FOR APPOINTMENT OF PROBATE CONSERVATOR OF THE PERSON

Hearing date
Aug 11, 2026
Department
Dept. A
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Ruling

Conservatorship of Merrily Wilkinson 26PR000046

PETITION FOR APPOINTMENT OF PROBATE CONSERVATOR OF THE PERSON

APPEARANCE REQUIRED

CIVIL LAW & MOTION CALENDAR – Hon. Cynthia P. Smith, Dept. A (Historic Courthouse) at 8:30 a.m.

Melissa Castellucci v. Peju Family Operating Partnership, LP 25CV000098

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION AND PAGE SETTLEMENT

TENTATIVE RULING: In reviewing the motion for preliminary approval of class action settlement, the Court orders further briefing on the following items:

1) A reasonable estimate of the nature and amount of recovery that each class member could have obtained if plaintiff prevailed; 2) Amount, or an estimate, of what each class member will receive from the settlement amount; 3) Explanation as to why the class representative enhancement is reasonable in light thereof; 4) Plaintiff shall submit a supplemental declaration estimating the number of hours she spent on the matter as class representative; 5) Plaintiff shall provide California caselaw authorizing class counsel fees in the amount of 35% of the settlement.

The additional briefing shall be filed and served by August 25, 2026. The matter is CONTINUED to September 2, 2026, at 8:30 a.m. in Dept. A.

Laurie Capitelli et al v. Melinda Stewart et al 26CV000878

DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFFS’ VERIFIED COMPLAINT

TENTATIVE RULING: The matter is CONTINUED to September 3, 2026 at 8:30 a.m. in Dept. A.

3

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share