DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26PR000068·napa·Civil·Probate
Hearing 3 months agoAPPEARANCE REQUIRED

Conservatorship of Mary Margaret Lee

PETITION FOR APPOINTMENT OF PROBATE CONSERVATOR OF THE PERSON

Hearing date
May 19, 2026
Department
Dept. A
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Parties

PetitionerMary Margaret Lee

Ruling

PROBATE CALENDAR – Hon. Cynthia P. Smith, Dept. A (Historic Courthouse) at 8:30 a.m.

Estate of Cristina Chiprez Gonzalez 23PR000176

FIRST AND FINAL REPORT OF ADMINISTRATOR ON WAIVER OF ACCOUNT AND PETITION FOR ITS SETTLEMENT, FOR ALLOWANCE OF STATUTORY COMPENSATION TO ADMINISTRATOR AND ATTORNEYS, AND REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES TO ATTORNEYS, FOR WITHHOLDING OF A RESERVE, AND FOR FINAL DISTRIBUTION

TENTATIVE RULING: The petition is GRANTED, including fees as prayed.

Estate of Anita R. Chambers 24PR000266

STATUS HEARING RE: FINAL DISTRIBUTION

TENTATIVE RULING: The Court finds that continuation of administration is in the best interests of the estate and interested persons. Thus, pursuant to Probate Code section 12201, subdivision (c)(2), the matter is CONTINUED to November 19, 2026, at 8:30 a.m. in Dept. A. The continued hearing may be vacated if, prior thereto, the personal representative files a petition for an order for final distribution. The personal representative shall file a status report 10 days prior to the next hearing. The Clerk is directed to provide notice to the parties.

Conservatorship of Mary Margaret Lee 26PR000068

PETITION FOR APPOINTMENT OF PROBATE CONSERVATOR OF THE PERSON

APPEARANCE REQUIRED

CIVIL LAW & MOTION CALENDAR – Hon. Cynthia P. Smith, Dept. A (Historic Courthouse) at 8:30 a.m.

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Yessica A Perez 24CV000032

MOTION TO VACATE DISMISSAL AND ENTER JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION

APPEARANCE REQUIRED. The Court takes judicial notice of the Stipulation filed in this action on April 27, 2026, indicating that the parties have entered into a novation of the original stipulated settlement. That novation appears to render the instant motion, to enforce the original stipulated settlement, MOOT. The Court, however, appears to retain jurisdiction,

2

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share