Motion to Compel Further Deposition Testimony of Witness Karina Vega, and for Monetary Sanctions Against Defendant CVUSD, and/or Attorney Randall Wine; and to Prevent CVUSD’s Attorney From Representing Ms. Vega Due to a Conflict of Interest
Browse all Motion to Compel Further Responses rulings statewide →
1. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME DEMURRER ON 3RD AMENDED CROSS-COMPLAINT OF BRUCE CVPS2402052 WONG VS AUERBACH AUERBACH BY DEBBIE CHAMBERLAIN, RODNEY CHAMBERLAIN, WONG FARMS LLC Tentative Ruling: No tentative ruling. Motion continued to 5.26.26.
2. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME CROSS-DEFENDANTS WONG AND WEINGARTEN'S JOINDER IN CROSS- DEFENDANTS DEBBIE CHABERLAIN, CVPS2402052 WONG VS AUERBACH RODNEY CHAMBERLAIN, AND WONG FARMS, LLC'S DEMURRER TO CROSS- COMPLAINANTS THIRD AMENDED CROSS-COMPLAINT Tentative Ruling: No tentative ruling. Motion continued to 5.26.26.
3. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER DEPOSITION TESTIMONY OF WITNESS KARINA VEGA, AND FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS AGAINST DEFENDANT CVUSD, AND/OR CVPS2501702 CARRERA VS GONZALEZ ATTORNEY RANDALL WINE; AND TO PREVENT CVUSD'S ATTORNEY FROM REPRESENTING MS. VEGA DUE TO A CONFLICT OF INTEREST BY CARISSA CARRERA Tentative Ruling: No tentative ruling. Motion continued to 6.11.26.
4. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME MIHAIL LARI VS STATE FARM GENERAL CVPS2602233 PETITION TO CONFIRM ARBITRATION INSURANCE CO., AN ILLINOIS CORP. Tentative Ruling: No tentative ruling. Motion continued to 6.11.26.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”