Agustin Garcia Hernandez, et al. vs Dan Erickson, et al.
Motions in Limine; Motion to Compel Further Responses to Special Interrogatories; Motion to Compel Further Responses to Requests for Admissions; Motion to Quash Plaintiff’s Notice in Lieu of Subpoena
Motion type
Monetary amounts referenced
Parties
Ruling
Hon. Mark Bacciarini Courtroom 10
627 W. 21st Street, Merced
Wednesday, July 15, 2026 8:15 a.m.
The following tentative rulings shall become the ruling of the court unless a party gives notice of intention to appear as follows: 1. You must call (209) 725-4240 to notify the court of your intent to appear.
2. You must give notice to all other parties before 4:00 p.m. of your intent to appear. Per California Rules of Court, rule 3.1308(a)(1), failure to do both items 1 and 2 will result in no oral argument. Note: Notifying CourtCall (the court’s telephonic appearance provider) of your intent to appear does not satisfy the requirement of notifying the court.
Case No. Title / Description
22CV-03409 Agustin Garcia Hernandez, et al. vs Dan Erickson, et al.
Further Proceedings Status of Judicial Reassignment
This matter will not be subject to judicial reassignment and will remain in Courtroom 10.
Motions in Limine
Continued to July 29, 2026, at 8:15 a.m. in Courtroom 10.
Motion to Compel Further Responses to Special Interrogatories, Set Two; Request for Sanctions in the Amount of $1,577.97
Continued to July 29, 2026, at 8:15 a.m. in Courtroom 10.
Motion to Compel Further Responses to Requests for Admissions, Set Two; Request for Sanctions in the amount of $1,577.97
Continued to July 29, 2026, at 8:15 a.m. in Courtroom 10.
Motion to Quash Plaintiff's Notice in Lieu of Subpoena
Continued to July 29, 2026, at 8:15 a.m. in Courtroom 10.
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”