DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
1377830·santabarbara·Civil·Conservatorship - Person and Estate
Hearing 9 days agoConservatorship to continue.

Conservatorship of Kayla L Hildenbrand

Review Investigator's Report

Hearing date
Aug 11, 2026
Department
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Aug 10, 2027
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Parties

OtherKayla L Hildenbrand

Ruling

Case Type Conservatorship Hearing Date / Time Tue, 08/11/2026 - 09:00 Nature of Proceedings Court Investigator's Biennial Review Tentative Ruling Probate Notes: The court investigator's report has been received and recommends that the conservatorship continue. No appearance is required. The next review hearing will be held on August 8, 2028. The Court will send notice to all parties. Tentative Ruling: Conservatorship of Kayla L Hildenbrand Tentative Ruling: Conservatorship of Kayla L Hildenbrand Case Number 1377830 Case Type Conservatorship - Person and Estate Hearing Date / Time Tue, 08/11/2026 - 09:00 Nature of Proceedings Review Investigator's Report Tentative Ruling Probate Notes: The court investigator's report has been received and recommends that the conservatorship continue.

No appearance is required. The next review hearing will be held on August 10, 2027. The Court will send notice to all parties. Tentative Ruling: Guardianship of Michael Marvin Nogues Tentative Ruling: Guardianship of Michael Marvin Nogues Case Number 18PR00202 Case Type Guardianship Hearing Date / Time Tue, 08/04/2026 - 09:00 Nature of Proceedings Petition for Visitation Tentative Ruling Probate Notes: Appearances required. Tentative Ruling: Conservatorship of Wayne O Evenson Tentative Ruling: Conservatorship of Wayne O Evenson

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share