DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
23CV1184·eldorado·Civil·Property
Hearing about 2 months agoGRANTED

TAHOE KEYS PROPERTY OWNERS’ ASSN. v. SOEVYN

Motion to Amend Judgment

Hearing date
Jun 26, 2026
Department
Judge
Prevailing
Moving Party
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffTahoe Keys Property Owners’ Assn.
DefendantSoevyn

Ruling

LAW AND MOTION CALENDAR JUNE 26, 2026

6. TAHOE KEYS PROPERTY OWNERS’ ASSN. v. SOEVYN, 23CV1184

Motion to Amend Judgment

TENTATIVE RULING # 6: MOTION IS GRANTED. THE CLERK IS DIRECTED TO AMEND THE

DEFENDANT’S ADDRESS ON THE JUDGMENT TO READ: 2023 GARMISH COURT, SOUTH

LAKE TAHOE, CA 96150, APN# 022-221-011-000. ADDITIONALLY, THE CLERK IS

DIRECTED TO ATTACH THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY (EXHIBIT A) TO THE

AMENDED JUDGMENT. NO HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE HELD (LEWIS v.

SUPERIOR COURT (1999) 19 CAL.4TH 1232, 1247), UNLESS A NOTICE OF INTENT TO

APPEAR AND REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT IS TRANSMITTED ELECTRONICALLY

THROUGH THE COURT’S WEBSITE OR BY TELEPHONE TO THE COURT AT (530) 573-3042

BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES

OF AN INTENT TO APPEAR MUST BE MADE BY TELEPHONE OR IN PERSON. PROOF OF

SERVICE OF SAID NOTICE MUST BE FILED PRIOR TO OR AT THE HEARING.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share