Richmond-Luwisch v. Richmond
Motion to vacate or modify renewal of judgment
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
Case: Richmond-Luwisch v. Richmond Case No. CV2015-1411 Hearing Date: August 18, 2026 Department Thirteen 9:00 a.m.
Plaintiff Scott Richmond-Luwisch’s unopposed motion to vacate or modify renewal of judgment is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (Code Civ. Proc., § 683.170.) Plaintiff failed to file with the Court a proof of service of this motion on defendant Pamela Richmond, as required. (683.170, subd. (b); Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1300(c) [“[p]roof of service of the moving papers must be filed no later than five court days before the time appointed for the hearing.”].)
The notice of motion does not provide notice of this Court’s tentative ruling system as required by Local Rule 11.2(b). Counsel for moving party, or the moving party if unrepresented by counsel, is ordered to notify the opposing party or parties immediately of the tentative ruling system.
If no hearing is requested, and no party appears at the hearing, this tentative ruling is effective immediately. No formal order pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312 or further notice is required.
5 of 7
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”