Hedrington v. Woolman
Motion to Vacate Judgment
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
(37) Tentative Ruling
Re: Hedrington v. Woolman Superior Court Case No. 25CECG01717
Hearing Date: August 18, 2026 (Dept. 403)
Motion: By Plaintiff Orlonzo Hedrington to Vacate Judgment
Tentative Ruling:
To deny.
Explanation:
On March 19, 2026, plaintiff filed a Notice of Motion and Motion to Vacate Fraud Judgment. Plaintiff seeks to void a judgment in Fresno Superior Court Case Number 22CECL00440. Notably, there is no proof of service as to this motion. Additionally, this motion seeks relief for a judgment obtained in a different matter. Accordingly, the motion is denied.
Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312(a), and Code of Civil Procedure section 1019.5, subdivision (a), no further written order is necessary. The minute order adopting this tentative ruling will serve as the order of the court and service by the clerk will constitute notice of the order.
Tentative Ruling
Issued By: SMC on August 17, 2026. (Judge’s initials) (Date)
3
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”