DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26CV01074·santabarbara·Civil·Civil Law & Motion
Hearing 5 days agoOff calendar

Marcus Millichap Real Estate Investment Services Inc vs Kevin Boeve

Petition Confirm Arbitration

Hearing date
Aug 14, 2026
Department
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$378,545.09

Parties

PlaintiffMarcus & Millichap Real Estate Investment Services, Inc.
DefendantKevin Boeve

Ruling

Case Number

Case Type Civil Law & Motion Hearing Date / Time Fri, 08/14/2026 - 10:00 Nature of Proceedings Petition Confirm Arbitration Tentative Ruling This action was initiated when petitioner Marcus & Millichap Real Estate Investment Services, Inc., filed a petition on February 18, 2026, to confirm an arbitration award in the amount of $378,545.09 in favor of petitioner and against respondent Kevin Boeve. An initial hearing was set for this petition to take place on June 26, 2026. (Not. of Hearing, filed March 5, 2026; Minute Order, June 26, 2026.) The court's minutes reflect that respondent appeared remotely at this June 26 hearing, but petitioner did not attend. (Ibid.) Respondent has not filed any

documents in this action. (Minute Order, June 26, 2026.) There is no indication in the court's records that any substantive arguments were presented by respondent at the June 26 hearing. (Ibid.) At the June 26 hearing, the court continued the hearing on the petition to this August 14 hearing. (Ibid.) No party has filed any documents since the June 26 hearing. The arbitration agreement attached to the petition does not indicate a method of service or notice. (See Pet., attah. 4(b) at pp. 7-9, P. 21(a)-(f).) "If the arbitration agreement does not provide the manner in which such service shall be made and the person upon whom service is to be made has not previously appeared in the proceeding and has not previously been served in accordance with this subdivision: [P.] (1) Service within this State shall be made in the manner provided by law for the service of summons in an action. [P.] (2) Service outside this State shall be made by mailing the copy of the petition and notice and other papers by registered or certified mail.

Personal service is the equivalent of such service by mail. Proof of service by mail shall be made by affidavit showing such mailing together with the return receipt of the United States Post Office bearing the signature of the person on whom service was made. Notwithstanding any other provision of this title, if service is made in the manner provided in this paragraph, the petition may not be heard until at least 30 days after the date of such service." (Code Civ. Proc., Sec. 1290.4, subd. (b).) "If the arbitration agreement does not provide the manner in which such service shall be made and the person on whom service is to be made has previously appeared in the proceeding or has previously been served in accordance with subdivision (b) of this section, service shall be made in the manner provided in Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 1010) of Title 14 of Part 2 of this code." (Code Civ.

Proc., Sec. 1290.4, subd. (c).) The court will require that service be effectuated on respondent pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1290.4. Petitioner has the burden to demonstrate service. (See Evid. Code Sec. 500.) The court will order this matter off-calendar, subject to being reset after petitioner has effectuated service on respondent pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1290.4 and filed proof of service with the court.

Tentative Ruling: Uri Dolev vs Sharon Granoff et al Tentative Ruling: Uri Dolev vs Sharon Granoff et al

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share